Boundary-crossing
God, we pray for your insight today as we seek to understand your Word and how
it calls us to live in faithful service to you. Amen.
There’s been a social media campaign online over the
past week or two. People are creating memes – pictures with witty captions –
that complete the thought, you might be a Lutheran if…
You
might be a Lutheran if fried chicken, mashed potatoes, and mac and cheese are
traditional funeral foods.
You
might be a Lutheran if your Vacation Bible School snack is tostadas.
You
might be a Lutheran if you have elephants roaming in your backyard.
You
might be a Lutheran if you serve roast goat for dessert.
This social media campaign was started because many of
us are sick and tired of the assumption that all Lutherans are of Scandinavian
or German heritage.
Folks
who posted these memes online were trying to break a stereotype that had no
meaning for them, except to make them feel excluded.
Many Lutheran churches in this country were begun by German
and Scandinavian immigrants, but that was a hundred and fifty years ago. We
cannot continue to expect Lutherans to resonate with the northern European culture
that was brought to this continent by immigrants in the 1800s.
Lutheranism is so much bigger than that.
Our church is about grace and faith, Word and
Sacrament.
It is
not about jello, casseroles, Ole and Lena jokes or lefse. If we limit our faith
to a cultural stereotype, we are doing it a great disservice.
Someone created the hashtag “decolonize Lutheranism” so
that people could follow all of the alternative views of Lutheranism that were
being shared online. She was making the point that Lutheranism isn’t just about
the culture that immigrants and missionaries brought with them to new places,
but is about the theology and how it is actually lived out in each culture that
has embraced that theology.
After his vision today in the book of Acts, Peter
could have created a hashtag called “decolonizing Christianity.” Or, since the
name “Christian” wasn’t really used yet in Bible times, his hashtag could have
been “decolonizing The Way.” That was one of the first names for the followers
of Jesus.
Early followers
of The Way were predominantly Jewish. They had been raised to follow the Jewish
faith, and all of the men had been circumcised as infants. You had to be
circumcised in order to be Jewish, you see. And you had to be Jewish in order
to be a follower of The Way, according to everything that the apostles knew and
believed.
And here was Peter, sharing sacred Christian community
with uncircumcised Gentiles – outsiders, according to all the critical
measures.
What were you thinking, Peter?
Sure, Jesus tells us to love one another – but surely
he was talking about the insiders! Jesus meant for us to love people who look
like us and talk like us, who were raised like us and who have a similar
experience of the world to ours.
Peter’s
friends and colleagues just can’t believe that the promise of Jesus is intended
for those dirty Gentiles.
As with most protests against inclusion, the followers of The Way who criticized Peter were scared. They were afraid of persecution, which was a real threat to their community. They were afraid that they would lose control of their churches, and that their children wouldn’t understand the sacrifices they had gone through to get to where they were.
If
Gentiles – members of the dominant culture, the occupying enemy forces – were
allowed to become followers of The Way, wouldn’t the face of the faith change?
Would it still mean as much as it had when Jesus was physically with his
disciples and sharing meals with them?
Peter’s critics were afraid of Gentiles becoming
Christian without first becoming Jewish.
It was
like those people who expect that folks must first become Scandinavian before
becoming Lutheran.
It’s unnecessary, and upon reflection, maybe a little
bit absurd. But it isn’t anything new.
In Peter’s time, followers of The Way were concerned
about losing their identity and letting the outsiders take over. They were
afraid that the definition of what it meant to be a follower of Jesus would
change.
It is the conflict that has plagued
Christianity for two thousand years.
Every time that a church community is established, it
draws borders around itself.
We’re
the Lutheran church, not Episcopalian, not Presbyterian.
OK, maybe we can play nice with those other
denominations, but don’t ask us to work with those Missouri Synod Lutheran
folks.
This one is particularly hard for me, as my ordination
and call to ministry wouldn’t be recognized in the Missouri Synod church.
But OK –
maybe we can try to play nice with other Lutherans, and with other Christian
denominations. But surely God doesn’t want us to work with folks from other
faith communities?
You get the picture. And I know that, for the most
part, I’m preaching to the choir here.
This congregation is full of members who have come from other Christian
denominations, who are married to people from various religious traditions, who
appreciate a wide range of cultures and traditions.
But you’ve heard these arguments before. It’s hard not to hear these arguments, if you ever
listen to the news and to the politicians and the talking heads who try to
instill fear in their listeners by preaching a gospel of exclusion.
But a gospel of exclusion is not the Gospel of Jesus
Christ.
From the
very beginnings of Christianity, Jesus has encouraged his followers to love everybody, to include anyone who wants to join, to reserve
judgment on others, and to be respectful of all cultures.
What God has called clean, we must not call profane!
Who are we to hinder God?
Don’t
put limits on God’s love. We have no authority to do that, and when we do, we
end up alienating the very people God sent to us.
When we experience conflict like the church did in
Peter’s time, the proper response is to show love to others – to shift our
understanding of God’s love to include the new evidence of community around us.
As one
of my pastor colleagues says, “shift happens.”
A shift
in our perspective is evidence of the action of the Holy Spirit.
And the Holy Spirit is all over today’s reading from
Acts.
The
Spirit gave Peter the vision of the animals, and told him that all of them were
ok to eat – even the ones that were un-kosher.
The Spirit told Peter not to make a distinction
between himself and the Gentile believers.
The Spirit led Cornelius to summon Peter
to his house.
And as Peter was a guest in that house, the Holy
Spirit fell upon everyone gathered, just as the Spirit had done with the
disciples on Pentecost.
The Gospel that God would have us proclaim – the one
that has been sent from God, embodied by Jesus, and proclaimed by faithful
Christians for the past two thousand years – is a Gospel of inclusion, love,
and welcome.
Jesus is the important thing that unites
us with other.
How we follow Jesus – the kind of music we love,
whether we commune with wine or grape juice, the style of our prayers, what we
serve at our church potlucks – these things hardly matter in the grand scheme of
things.
Our job is to be inclusive.
Now, this is difficult sometimes – many times,
actually.
First we have to overcome our stereotypes and
assumptions.
But we do work really hard at this – we already
know not to categorize people, and to respect everyone as a child of God.
The hardest part comes when the people we are trying
to welcome don’t actually respond to our invitations.
Imagine
that today’s Bible story had happened a little bit differently.
What would it have been like if Peter had had this
vision, and the Holy Spirit had sent him to Cornelius’ house, but Cornelius
hadn’t received a message from the Spirit about welcoming Peter in?
How
could Peter have shared his message if he had been rejected by the people he
was trying to serve?
This is the question that plagues many progressive
churches like ours.
We want to
include people of all sexual orientations and identities, but most people who
come through our doors are heterosexual folks who identify with the gender they
were assigned at birth.
We want to work on racial reconciliation,
but our congregation remains largely white.
We want to
work on interfaith dialogue and we want
to welcome immigrants to our community, but we don’t know where to begin.
And sometimes, when we do begin, it seems
like our efforts bear no fruit.
Cornelius may not trust Peter. But that doesn’t mean that
he should be left out.
Recovering
Catholics, transgender folks, immigrants, those who have been hurt by the
church in the past… these people may choose to stay away from us, no matter how
welcoming we try to make our ministry.
But we leave the door open to them.
Jesus tells us to love everyone.
Peter’s
dream tells us not to draw distinctions between people, but to have an open and
inclusive community.
And so we do our best.
And it’s
because people have been doing their
best at making a welcoming community here at this church for years that many of
us came to be members here.
We fail sometimes. There are people who leave this
place feeling like they were not heard or respected or loved for who they are.
But when
we hear about that happening, I know that we do our best to fix the situation,
and to make sure that it never happens again.
That’s the lesson from Peter today.
Welcoming
people from all walks of life isn’t easy. Sometimes God needs to tell us many
times over before we get the message.
But we continue to work on shifting our understanding
of the Gospel, of what it means and who it’s for. We continue to expand our
understanding of insider and outsider. And we continue to show the love of
Jesus to other people in the ways that will be most meaningful to them.
Praise God for the inclusion that we have come to
discover as followers of Jesus.
And may God give us the grace to show that level of
welcome to others.
Amen.
Amen.
Easter 5C, 4/24/16
Acts 11:1-18; John 13:31-35